WikiLeaks: E-mails Expose Clinton Gun-running to Terrorists

ENOUGH IS ENOUGH when is Congress going to take action against these traitors?

One e-mail reveals that an effort by Libyan dictator Moammar Gadhafi to create a gold-backed currency for the region was among the key reasons globalists supported killing Gadhafi and destroying Libya. Other e-mails reveal that the Obama administration knowingly supported al-Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood in Syria, hoping to create an Islamic State. Another shows that Clinton knew her Libyan “rebels” were massacring blacks as part of an “ethnic cleansing” campaign, along with other war crimes. So far, though, the press has largely ignored the scandals, and in some especially bizarre cases has even tried to deny reality.The pro-transparency organization WikiLeaks has released, among other documents related to Clinton, a trove of more than 30,000 e-mails and attachments sent to and from her private server. The e-mails cover Clinton’s tenure as secretary of state — perhaps most infamous for the disasters in Libya, including the Benghazi attack that killed four Americans, the takeover of the country by terror armies, and the brutal summary execution of a former U.S. terror-war ally. “We came, we saw, he died,” Clinton boasted about Gadhafi before cackling maniacally. Despite a virtual blackout by the Clinton-supporting establishment media, Clinton’s involvement in the arming, training, and funding of terrorist groups in Libya and Syria has been well known to more informed segments of the electorate for years. In recent months, GOP presidential candidate Donald Trump has been making a big issue out of it. The scandals could prove damaging to Clinton once again, especially considering her apparently false testimony made to lawmakers under oath.

Source: WikiLeaks: E-mails Expose Clinton Gun-running to Terrorists – ‘Nox & Friends

Lawmakers: ‘Ransom’ to Iran puts Americans at risk

The cash transfer, as reported by The Wall Street Journal, was the first installment paid in a $1.7 billion settlement the Obama administration reached with Iran to resolve a failed 1979 arms deal dating from just before the Iranian Revolution.The cash flown to Iran consisted of euros, Swiss francs, and other currencies because U.S. law forbids transacting American dollars with Iran. While the Obama administration denied the cash transfer was done to secure the release of the four Americans, GOP lawmakers said it was tantamount to “ransom.””Paying ransom to kidnappers puts Americans even more at risk,” Sen. Mark Kirk, R-Ill., said in a statement. “While Americans were relieved by Iran’s overdue release of illegally imprisoned American hostages, the White House’s policy of appeasement has led Iran to illegally seize more American hostages.”The four released Americans are Washington Post reporter Jason Rezaian; Amir Hekmati, a former U.S. Marine; Christian pastor Saeed Abedini; and Nosratollah Khosravi-Roodsari, whose case had not been publicized before the release.

Source: Lawmakers: ‘Ransom’ to Iran puts Americans at risk | Fox News

muslim Barbarians Torture Dying Russian Soldiers From Helicopter Crash And Desecrate Their Bodies While Screaming “Allahu Akbar” | 

Keep in mind all of the people praising this are American-supported Muslim terrorists. One can only imagine what America might do, say Russia if these men were our soldiers and Russia was backing these terrorists. I assure you the reaction would be different.

Source: Muslim Barbarians Torture Dying Russian Soldiers From Helicopter Crash And Desecrate Their Bodies While Screaming “Allahu Akbar” | Walid Shoebat

See No Evil: Khan-troversy Repeats Five Big Lies of the Left

1. Terror has “nothing to do with Islam.” That statement, made by Mr. Khan to CNN on Sunday, is simply ridiculous. It also happens to be the stated policy position of the Obama administration and Hillary Clinton’s campaign. The left clings to this belief because it is not prepared to confront the ongoing terror threat, or to admit the failure of its multiculturalist policies. That cognitive dissonance persists even among those who are terror’s victims.2. Conservatives oppose all immigration. Mr. Khan told the Democratic National Convention: “If it was up to Donald Trump, [my son] never would have been in America.” The Khan family came to America in 1980, when Islamic terrorists had barely begun to attack the U.S. Trump has presented different versions of his proposal, but the basic thrust is to allow legal immigration while limiting it from terror-prone countries. The Khan family would have been welcome.3. War is never the answer. That claim was not made by Khan himself, but was implicit in the audience’s reaction inside the Wells Fargo Arena. While they applauded the Khans, left-wing, anti-war delegates heckled the military speakers that followed, including a wounded veteran. Happy to honor a dead veteran, whose sacrifice might suggest the futility of war, they were rude to living ones. The left rejects war, period — though weakness has always invited aggression.4. The Constitution doesn’t mean what it says. The left likes to reinterpret the text for its own purposes. Thus Mr. Khan held a pocket Constitution aloft, and mocked Trump’s immigration policy: “Have you even read the U.S. Constitution? I will gladly lend you my copy. In this document, look for the words ‘liberty’ and ‘equal protection of law.’” The latter phrase only applies to citizens, not immigrants. Trump’s policy might be inadvisable, but it is constitutional.5. The media have no liberal bias. When Patricia Smith, the bereaved mother of Benghazi hero Sean Smith, spoke at the Republican National Convention, she received 70 seconds of network coverage. Mr. Khan and his wife have enjoyed 50 times more attention, according to an analysis by NewsBusters, as they continue an extensive circuit of sympathetic interviews and TV appearances. The left pretends the media are not biased, but the numbers tell the truth.And the core truth, which Mr. Khan and his friends in the media wish to suppress, is that radical Islam is directly responsible for brutal terrorism that threatens Americans and innocent people around the world.Rather than question Ghazala Khan’s silence onstage, Trump would have done better to insist that he will be the best president American Muslims have ever had, since only he will prevent militant infiltrators from recruiting American Muslim youth to their cause.From a conservative perspective, it has been disheartening to see Donald Trump struggle to react appropriately to a speech that, while powerfully emotive, was based on false premises.There is a silver lining, however. Perhaps more American Muslims will be motivated to serve by the Khan family’s example.And perhaps some of Khan’s new liberal fans, having rushed to buy copies of the pocket Constitution he held onstage, might actually try reading it properly for once.

Source: See No Evil: Khan-troversy Repeats Five Big Lies of the Left

Leave killary to me 

Pence told Trump: “There’s something you ought to know about me. Traditionally, the running mate is assigned the job of attacking the presidential nominee of the other party. But I took a pledge back in 1991—you might call it a conversion—that negative campaigning is wrong. So, I’m not going to go negative on Hillary. Do you still want me as your vice president?”

And again according to my sources, Trump looked at Pence and said with Trumpian relish: “Don’t worry—leave Hillary to me.”